Notes from the Editors: Physics—one year out of the gate

Physics 2, 77
More than a year ago, the American Physical Society launched Physics with the goal of having scientists explain and comment on the work of their peers, as published in the journals of the APS. This newest of the APS publications went online in beta mode on 14 July 2008 with a full complement of expert commentaries, followed by a bigger splash in September 2008 with email announcements to APS members, authors, and referees

More than a year ago, the American Physical Society launched Physics with the goal of having scientists explain and comment on the work of their peers, as published in the journals of the APS. This newest of the APS publications went online in beta mode on 14 July 2008 with a full complement of expert commentaries, followed by a bigger splash in September 2008 with email announcements to APS members, authors, and referees.

Our readers have been generous with their comments, and judging from the feedback, the experiment has been a success: Physics has become a must-read for the physics community. We've amassed an impressive archive of expert commentaries and reviews, with more than 100 Viewpoints, 8 Trends articles, and over 150 Synopses, all easily searchable by name, keyword, article type, and subject category. Each week, email alerts are sent to registered readers and RSS feeds provide a convenient way to obtain real-time updates on new content. We have started a Letters to the Editor section to provide a way for readers to comment on the articles in Physics. In addition, we provide information to journalists each week to gain additional coverage of the articles highlighted in Physics. All of these efforts are designed to give more attention to the exciting research published in the APS journals, and we expect to offer new features in this fluid medium of online publishing in the future.

Launching Physics has furthered discussion among the staff of APS. While recognizing that there isn’t an absolute metric for what defines a “top” paper, nor would it be possible to do this perfectly, the editors have eagerly combined their knowledge of new and developing fields, the invaluable reports from referees and, often, additional opinions from trusted experts to select high-quality papers that will be of interest to the physics community in its broadest sense. In this respect, Physics has afforded a closer communication between the editorial staff and the physics community at large.

The kind of exposition and explanation featured in Physics is among the most difficult kind of writing. It requires excellent communication that can capture the attention and respect of those already at the top of their careers, without losing students at the beginning of theirs. Physics would not have been possible without the generous effort and commitment of time provided by the researchers and editors who advise us and write these difficult articles. We thank you all profusely.

– David Voss, Editor, and Jessica Thomas, Assistant Editor


Recent Articles

Synopsis: Doubling Up with Superfluids
Superfluidity

Synopsis: Doubling Up with Superfluids

Researchers mixed two superfluids of different atoms together and observed that vortices in one affected those in the other—evidence of mutual interaction between the two species. Read More »

Viewpoint: Improving Electronic Structure Calculations
Materials Science

Viewpoint: Improving Electronic Structure Calculations

A new approach to calculating the properties of molecules and solids may offer higher accuracy at reasonable computational cost, accelerating the discovery of useful materials. Read More »

Focus: Strong Light Reflection from Few Atoms
Optics

Focus: Strong Light Reflection from Few Atoms

Up to 75% of light reflects from just 2000 atoms aligned along an optical fiber, an arrangement that could be useful in photonic circuits. Read More »

More Articles