Electronic and nuclear spins in insulating crystals interact weakly with their environments, making them candidate systems for applications in quantum information processing [1, 2]. Several features of the nitrogen vacancy () center in diamond (see Fig. 1) make it ideal for this purpose, as well as for sensitive magnetometry [3, 4]: The electron spin has been shown  to store quantum information for longer than any other solid-state system at room temperature. Additionally, this spin state can be partially initialized to a useful starting state simply by the application of light . The same light excites spin-dependent fluorescence  bright enough to study single centers at room temperature . Performing these experiments at low temperatures has even made it possible to readout the spin state of a single center ; to qualify as spin state readout, the signal averaging must be completed before the spin state information is destroyed.
For room-temperature single demonstrations to date, the signal-to-noise ratio obtained before destroying a spin state is only , preventing single spin state readout, and requiring signal averaging over many runs. The desire to go beyond this has led several groups to develop novel readout techniques. One recent technique uses nearby isotopes, nuclear spins, to store the electronic spin state before using the same electronic spin to repeatedly readout the state of the spins . This repeated readout technique works because the nuclear spins are disturbed less than the electron spins by the fluorescence measurement process. An improvement in the signal-to-noise by a factor of was hence shown, but a different center with a different distribution of nearby spins would require a modified technique and produce different signal-to-noise.
A paper published in the latest issue of Physical Review B presents an alternative readout technique that makes use of the nuclear spin that is almost universally present in centers . Matthias Steiner, Philipp Neumann, Johannes Beck, Fedor Jelezko, and Jörg Wrachtrup from Stuttgart University, Germany, have thereby demonstrated a signal-to-noise enhancement by a factor of . Most parade routes are designed to emphasize high visibility of the marchers and dignitaries rather than the shortest path from start to finish, and a similar approach has been applied to qubit readout by the Stuttgart group.
Two electron spin states are used as the logical qubit (or the magnetic sensor), and each of these is split into three by the spin as shown in Fig. 1. Spin selection rules limit the allowed transitions between the six levels and the traditional readout of the qubit state proceeds along route from to via the excited states. To enhance the readout signal, the energy levels are modified by applying a magnetic field of along the symmetry axis of the center (see inset of Fig. 1). This brings the system to a level anticrossing (LAC) in the excited state where the two electron spin states have the same energy . The excited state is accessed by the application of light for the fluorescence readout, and the LAC permits transitions between the logical qubit states. With the field on, the application of light polarizes not only the electron spin but also the nitrogen nuclear spin .
To prepare for the enhanced readout, the system is coherently driven along route (see Fig. 1) by the application of rf radiation. Then, as a result of the LAC and spin-selection rules, the fluorescent readout leads the system along route . Route is three times longer than route , and each step proceeds via the excited states. Three times more signal is detected as a result of this indirect series of events. Taking the indirect route postpones the destruction of the original spin state information. This “destruction” of the information is actually useful to researchers, as the system is left in a polarized spin state, which is a convenient starting state for these experiments .
To carry out the enhanced readout, it was necessary to coherently manipulate the nuclear spin (route ), and the success of this shows that this spin could be a useful qubit also. The first demonstration of coherent control over a single spin has been carried out simultaneously by researchers at Bates College, US . Their work also uses the LAC but describes the possibility of reading out single nuclear qubits that could be , , or , all via the electron spin.
A complementary approach to room-temperature spin state readout of a single center is simply to collect more of the fluorescent light emitted. This can be achieved by putting a nanocrystal of diamond into a cavity, which efficiently couples photons to the detector . Combining a cavity experiment with one of the enhanced measurement protocols described here could allow researchers to ask what spin state a is in at room temperature.
Beyond this goal lies the broader challenge of diamond quantum computing, which will require progress in scalable techniques for controllably coupling spins. The three-spin experiments performed already  are impressive but do not appear to scale up to many qubits. It may be possible to overcome this by using control spins to turn couplings on and off , or even by entangling distant qubits with photon measurements .
The prospect of a room-temperature quantum computer in the solid state is likely to attract even more scientists to the parade and the indirect readout route described by Steiner et al. may be part of the finale.
- D. Loss, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
- B. E. Kane, Nature 393, 133 (1998).
- J. R. Maze et al., Nature 455, 644 (2008).
- G. Balasubramanian et al., Nature 455, 648 (2008).
- G. Balasubramanian et al., Nature Mat. 8, 383 (2009).
- J. Harrison, M. J. Sellars, and N. B. Manson, J. Lumines. 107, 245 (2004).
- E. van Oort, N. B. Manson, and M. Glasbeek, J. Phys. C 21, 4385 (1988).
- A. Gruber et al., Science 276, 2012 (1997).
- F. Jelezko et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2160 (2002).
- L. Jiang et al., Science 326, 267 (2009).
- M. Steiner, P. Neumann, J. Beck, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. B 81, 035205 (2010).
- G. D. Fuchs et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 117601 (2008).
- V. Jacques et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057403 (2009).
- B. Smeltzer, J. McIntyre, L. Childress, arXiv:0909.3896v1 (quant-ph) (2009).
- Y. S. Park, A. K. Cook, and H. L. Wang, Nano Lett. 6, 2075 (2006).
- P. Neumann et al., Science 320, 1326 (2008).
- A. M. Stoneham, A. H. Harker, and G. W. Morley, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 21, 364222 (2009).
- S. C. Benjamin et al., New J. Phys. 8, 9 (2006).