Synopsis: Explaining Aftershock Clustering

A study of bursting phenomena like earthquakes suggests that events appear to cluster in time because of the way that small events like aftershocks are identified.

An earthquake is often followed by smaller aftershocks. This clustering of events in time is difficult to explain with theories of how earthquakes and other “avalanche” phenomena are triggered. A new study suggests that the observed clustering is an artifact of how scientists identify these events with a threshold, such as a specific seismic-wave intensity. The researchers argue that the threshold hides the fact that a small event (or “subavalanche”) is usually just a part of a bigger event.

Avalanche theories—based on the buildup and eventual release of an external stress—accurately describe the number of large (rare) events relative to smaller (more common) events. However, these models also predict that the avalanche events are triggered randomly in time. In other words, the waiting time to the next event shouldn’t depend on the previous avalanches. But this contradicts that you are, for example, more likely to experience an aftershock one day after a large quake than ten days later.

Lasse Laurson from Aalto University in Finland and his colleagues have found a possible explanation for the clustering in the use of thresholds to characterize avalanche behavior. For their experimental model, they chose the cracking of a transparent plastic block. A high-speed camera captured the speed of the crack, showing intermittent bursts in which the crack jumped forward. In their analysis, the team defined a threshold velocity, such that any peak in velocity above that threshold was called an avalanche. They found that setting a high threshold had the effect of dividing a single avalanche into several subavalanches. By decreasing the threshold value, the authors recovered a random waiting-time distribution, as expected from avalanche theories.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters.

–Michael Schirber

Michael Schirber is a Corresponding Editor for Physics based in Lyon, France.


Features

More Features »

Announcements

More Announcements »

Subject Areas

GeophysicsNonlinear Dynamics

Previous Synopsis

Next Synopsis

Energy Research

Starting Fluid for Laser Fusion

Read More »

Related Articles

Synopsis: The Geometry of Arctic Ponds
Geophysics

Synopsis: The Geometry of Arctic Ponds

A geometric model of meltwater ponds may help predict how the polar ice caps might evolve under future climate changes. Read More »

Viewpoint: Brain Motion Under Impact
Nonlinear Dynamics

Viewpoint: Brain Motion Under Impact

A numerical study suggests that head impacts primarily induce a few low-frequency, damped modes of vibration in brain tissue, a finding that could inform the design of sports helmets. Read More »

Synopsis: Silica’s High-Pressure Phase
Materials Science

Synopsis: Silica’s High-Pressure Phase

The rapid compression of silica to pressures of 36 GPa and higher transforms it from an amorphous material to a tetragonal crystal. Read More »

More Articles