Synopsis

Anomalous Magnetic Moment Still Anomalous

Physics 13, s39
Supercomputer simulations rule out a known quantum effect as the cause of the muon’s unexpectedly strong magnetic moment.

Physics advances when observations don’t match theory, so it’s unfortunate that the standard model explains the properties of fundamental particles and fields so well. One rare example where experiments diverge from model predictions is for the strength of a muon’s magnetic moment. Now, using state-of-the-art supercomputer simulations, Thomas Blum at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, and colleagues show that a quantum effect previously considered a likely contributor to the anomalous magnetic moment cannot account for the discrepancy. The result is good news for researchers hoping that this inconsistency signals new physics beyond the standard model.

The best measurements of a muon’s magnetic moment find a value 3.7 standard deviations larger than that of predictions. Before invoking yet-undiscovered physics to explain the anomaly, researchers must exclude known phenomena. One such phenomenon whose contribution is uncertain is “hadronic light-by-light” (HLbL) scattering, where a muon’s magnetic moment is modified because of interactions with a virtual photon. The process is difficult to model accurately because it involves a complex sequence of intermediary interactions, including those with virtual hadrons and with a virtual photon emitted by the muon.

The researchers modeled the process using a simulation that combined quantum electrodynamics (the theory that handles light-matter interactions) and quantum chromodynamics (the theory that describes strong-force interactions inside hadrons). They produced a range of estimates for the HLbL effect and found that its contribution was much too small to explain the anomaly. This theoretical prediction could be tested soon in forthcoming high-precision measurements. If the new measurements match the predictions, it will be another successful application of the standard model. But the researchers say that it will be much more exciting if the discrepancy remains.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters.

–Marric Stephens

Marric Stephens is a freelance science writer based in Bristol, UK.


Subject Areas

Particles and Fields

Related Articles

A Pulsed Magnetometer Beats a Steady One
Magnetism

A Pulsed Magnetometer Beats a Steady One

An atomic magnetometer using a pulsed laser may offer higher sensitivity to signs of new physics than continuous-laser versions. Read More »

Targeting Entire Galaxies in Axion Search
Astrophysics

Targeting Entire Galaxies in Axion Search

Two independent teams have searched for axions using x-ray observations of entire galaxies, setting some of the strictest constraints to date on the properties of these dark matter candidates. Read More »

Evidence for an Exotic Antimatter Nucleus
Particles and Fields

Evidence for an Exotic Antimatter Nucleus

Experiments at the Large Hadron Collider have revealed a previously unseen nucleus known as antihyperhelium-4. Read More »

More Articles