It’s Time to Act on Supporting Public Engagement

Physics 14, 102
The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a systemic lack of support for the public-engagement programs of physics departments, a trend that the physics community should act to correct.
Many public engagement programs are at risk of disappearing, taking with them an essential communication pathway between physicists and society at large.

“I hated physics,” is a response many physicists might be familiar with hearing after introducing themselves at a party or on a plane. Usually, the phrase is followed by the person describing some negative experience that they had with a physics coursework assignment in high school or college.

As physicists, we know that physics is so much more than the lackluster experiences that might be associated with formal education. That is why we, and many other physicists, engage with people outside of the field through informal education, or “outreach,” or, as we prefer to call it, “public engagement.” These efforts, which include public talks, experimental demonstrations, podcasts, and YouTube channels, help nonphysicists decouple their specific negative physics experiences from the joy that the field as a whole can offer. These initiatives are also the main ways that nonphysicists come to understand what physicists do. But sadly, these activities are often undervalued by the departments that house them and—as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic—are at risk of disappearing entirely. Without increased support for public-engagement programs, physicists may lose an essential connection to society at large.

Public engagement by physicists has a long history. One early example is an 1825 lecture by Michael Faraday. (His talk was the first “Christmas Lecture” given at the Royal Institution in the UK, a tradition that continues today.) But these efforts are often fringe activities, occurring as pet faculty projects or “extracurricular” student activities, for example. What’s more, the efforts are often one-off events, or they last only as long as a specific grant’s funding.

Even in relatively small doses, public engagement activities can provide substantial, meaningful experiences for audience members and organizers alike: Audience members get to learn about current research efforts outside of the classroom and, importantly, both groups get to directly interact with each other, making personal connections. These interactions are often the only way audience members engage directly with physicists. In addition, our research has shown that when physics students organize and facilitate these events, they gain, among other things, improved science communication skills, opportunities for pedagogical practice, and a sense of community.

Despite these benefits, public engagement programs tend not to be treated as core activities within physics departments. This issue has become especially apparent over the last year and a half. In a study that we published today, we investigated the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on 15 U.S.-based public engagement programs housed at universities and science centers. Nearly all of the studied programs reported ceasing their regular activities shortly after the beginning of the U.S. COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020. For example, one program, which partnered with a local museum to host “science day” events, stopped such events entirely because social-distancing requirements meant that the museum venue couldn’t be used. Distressingly, even as some semblance of “normal” life returns, the future of many of these programs remains uncertain—program directors for nine of the 15 programs that we studied doubted that they would recommence any of their traditional operations.

Our study did, however, uncover some good news—four of the programs that we studied thrived during the pandemic, expanding their activities. What set these programs apart was that they all had robust institutional support. All four of these programs were—and still are—supported both financially and logistically by either university-level institutions, dedicated national research grants, or both. As a result, these programs were able to adapt to the challenges of operating during a pandemic, such as loss of ticketing income and closure of venues.

Another conclusion of our study is that the ability of the public-engagement programs we studied to weather the COVID-19 storm directly depended on institutions maintaining their support. In a crisis, it may be tempting for department leaders to withdraw funding and focus on more “traditional” core activities. It is clear from our data, however, that public-engagement programs simply cannot survive in crisis conditions without this support: Once a program ceases activity, it loses its connection to the community and may lose its personnel and even its institutional memory, making it extremely challenging for that program to restart.

So, what can we all do to fix the problem? First and foremost, physicists need to treat engagement with nonphysicists as a core institutional and departmental activity. That change requires building funding options for engagement efforts directly into departmental budgets. Many physics departments already claim credit for engagement efforts in reports to funding agencies, so, we argue, they should also provide the needed resources to make those efforts robust. Departments also need to incentivize the involvement of faculty and staff in these programs, perhaps by making these activities a component of tenure review or by providing visible recognition to the staff and students who lead these programs. These actions would normalize participation in informal education efforts, rather than frame it as a distraction from the “true” work of research. We also argue that departments need to support research that evaluates public-engagement programs so that the field can develop a deep understanding of the long-term impact of its engagement efforts.

We are all members of the communities in which we live and work. If we want to change the perception of physics for those outside of the field, we need to change our own perceptions of the importance of engaging with nonphysicists and of the value of such efforts.

About the Authors

Image of Michael Bennett

Mike Bennett is the Director for Education and Workforce Development at the Q-SEnSE Quantum Leap Challenge Institute, Colorado. Prior to that, he worked as the Director of Public Engagement for the JILA NSF Physics Frontier Center and as a research associate with the University of Colorado Boulder’s physics education research group. Bennett has over a decade of experience designing, implementing, and researching informal physics education programs, with a particular focus on the ways in which university students’ experiences in education impact their mentoring outside of the classroom. Bennett is also a founding member of the Informal Physics Education Research network.

Image of Katie Hinko

Katie Hinko is an assistant professor of physics at Michigan State University (MSU). She is the principal investigator on multiple NSF projects focused on studying the impact of informal physics programs on the physicists and physics students who facilitate them, on the youth and public audiences that engage with them, and on the national trends in informal physics-program development and support. Prior to coming to MSU, Hinko was a senior research associate in the physics education research group at the University of Colorado Boulder. She received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Austin.

Image of Dena Izadi

Dena Izadi is a senior research associate in the physics education research lab at Michigan State University. She holds a Ph.D. in experimental biophysics. Izadi’s work is focused on using qualitative methods in characterizing the landscape of physics public engagement across the United States. Her primary research interests are creating evidence-based assessment tools and designing and conducting qualitative research practices for equitable and accessible education. Izadi is also passionate about creating hybrid spaces for blending physics with other disciplines, including art and design, to make physics more inviting to nonphysicists and the general public.

Recent Articles

Moving Medicine Out of the Clinic

Moving Medicine Out of the Clinic

Engineer John Ho develops wireless technologies for monitoring signals produced by the body, hoping that the devices he creates will enable clinicians to diagnose and treat diseases remotely. Read More »

Windbreaks May Improve Wind Farm Power
Fluid Dynamics

Windbreaks May Improve Wind Farm Power

Simulations suggest that optimally placed barriers could boost wind farm performance by as much as 10%. Read More »

New Behaviors from an Old Forest Fire Model
Nonlinear Dynamics

New Behaviors from an Old Forest Fire Model

Self-organizing properties, unnoticed for decades, are observed in changes in the density of trees in a forest that can catch fire. Read More »

More Articles