Focus: Nobel Focus: Limited Freedom for Quarks

Phys. Rev. Focus 14, 15
The theorists who explained how quarks could be loosely bound yet inseparable won the 2004 physics Nobel Prize.
Figure caption
Jefferson Lab
Quarks galore. A fast electron aimed at the proton and neutron in a nucleus (top) momentarily creates a flurry of virtual particles that quickly condense into two mesons made of quark-antiquark pairs. This year’s Nobel Prize recognizes the first quantitative theory for quark interactions. (See movie below.)Quarks galore. A fast electron aimed at the proton and neutron in a nucleus (top) momentarily creates a flurry of virtual particles that quickly condense into two mesons made of quark-antiquark pairs. This year’s Nobel Prize recognizes the first quan... Show more

This year’s Nobel Prize in Physics honors three theorists whose insight resolved what had appeared to be an intractable subatomic paradox. By the late 1960s physicists believed that protons, neutrons, and many other particles were made of quarks that remained firmly locked together and never appeared in isolation. Yet experiments indicated that quarks within protons were only loosely bound together. In 1973, David Gross, now at the University of California, Santa Barbara; Frank Wilczek, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge; and David Politzer, of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, published papers in PRL and Physical Review D that explained how a single force acting between quarks could account for these seemingly contradictory facts.

Researchers then had no good theory of the so-called strong nuclear force that holds quarks together. To probe the mechanism of quark confinement, experimenters blasted protons with high-energy electrons. The more energetic was the electron beam, the more the electrons reacted as if they were encountering particles moving freely within the proton, hardly stuck together at all. Physicists coined the term “asymptotic freedom” to describe the way quarks seemed to interact more feebly at higher energies. This phenomenon was surprising because the highest-energy collisions probe the strong force at the shortest distances, where researchers expected to encounter its most robust effects–just as two electrically charged particles feel a greater force the closer they are to each other.

Movie courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy’s Jefferson Laboratory.
Quark Smash-up. An electron blasts a proton and neutron into myriad virtual particles, which then reconfigure themselves into two double-quark particles.

The apparent contradiction between asymptotic freedom and quark confinement created “chaos and turmoil” in the theory of the strong interaction, recalls Chris Quigg of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois. David Gross, then at Princeton University, and his student Frank Wilczek set out to satisfy themselves that no legitimate quantum theory of particle interactions could display asymptotic freedom. To universal surprise, they found exactly the opposite, discovering a class of theories in which the strength of the interaction becomes steadily smaller at shorter distances. Like a ping-pong ball tethered by elastic to a wooden paddle, the farther you try to separate a quark from its neighbors, the stronger the attraction becomes. David Politzer, then a graduate student at Harvard University, independently came to the same conclusion, and their papers appeared back-to-back in PRL.

Within months, a quantitative strong interaction theory followed. In Physical Review D Gross and Wilczek showed that the strong force acted on a property called color, helping to flesh out a theory of “quantum chromodynamics” previously postulated by Murray Gell-Mann, then of the California Institute of Technology.

In this scheme, quark-antiquark pairs form kaons, pions, and other mesons, while triplets of quarks form protons, neutrons, and numerous heavier cousins that appeared in accelerator experiments. Gross and Wilczek’s theory also hints at an explanation of why no isolated quark can be liberated: If you hit a proton hard enough, the energy simply creates a new quark-antiquark pair–a meson–rather than knocking out a free quark. Most physicists find this argument convincing, though there is still no complete theoretical proof for absolute quark confinement.

Armed with a calculable theory of strong interactions, physicists could begin to tackle questions that had seemed beyond their grasp, says Quigg. The proton’s mass, for example, arises because of the energy tied up in the strong binding of three quarks. Gross, Wilczek, and Politzer may not have found what they originally thought they would find, Quigg adds, but they got something “infinitely more wonderful.”

–David Lindley

David Lindley is a freelance writer in Alexandria, Virginia, and author of Uncertainty: Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr, and the Struggle for the Soul of Science (Doubleday, 2007).

Subject Areas

Nuclear Physics

Related Articles

Synopsis: Throwing Nuclei in the Ring
Nuclear Physics

Synopsis: Throwing Nuclei in the Ring

By trapping nuclei in a particle storage ring, researchers characterize previously inaccessible nuclear reactions that take place in stellar explosions. Read More »

Viewpoint: Cavity with Iron Nuclei Slows Down X Rays

Viewpoint: Cavity with Iron Nuclei Slows Down X Rays

Slow light effects have been measured for x rays using a cavity filled with iron nuclei, where the speed of light was reduced by a factor of 10,000. Read More »

Viewpoint: Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron
Particles and Fields

Viewpoint: Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron

An electron’s energy can be determined with high accuracy by detecting the radiation it emits when moving in a magnetic field. Read More »

More Articles