Synopsis: Error tracking

Various models in nuclear physics can be used to fit the masses of known nuclei, but the predictions tend to be inconsistent for masses that have not been measured. A thorough study examines this problem and provides a route to quantify these errors.
Synopsis figure
Illustration: Alan Stonebraker

The measured masses of over 2000 nuclei can be fit to a variety of nuclear models by varying the parameters of these models. The rms deviations of the fits are of the order of 0.6 MeV (relative to the ~ MeV energy scale of interest). However, the predictions for masses that have not been measured vary greatly from model to model. This poses a clear problem for making predictions in, for example, the r-process path for nucleosynthesis, which involves nuclei that are far from the line of stability and whose masses must be extrapolated from fits to known nuclei.

In a paper appearing in Physical Review C, Jussi Toivanen, Jacek Dobaczewski, and colleagues at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland present a method for estimating the uncertainties in the predictions for the masses of unmeasured nuclei. The procedure is based on standard statistical methods for varying only well-determined, linear combinations of the parameters in a model. The authors also distinguish between exact models, where experimental errors dominate, and inexact models, where the theoretical fit is poorer than the experimental error. The latter is the case for nuclear masses.

Taking a microscopic-macroscopic model based on the liquid drop model with shell-correction energies, they give a series of illustrations of what the nuclear mass fits look like when the number of parameters in the model for the shell corrections is successively restricted. They also illustrate how the data can be weighted to emphasize the importance of certain classes of nuclei, for example, light versus heavy nuclei.

The bottom line of the work is that greater care should be taken to estimate the reliability of extrapolations using mass fits. – John Millener


More Announcements »

Subject Areas

Nuclear Physics

Previous Synopsis

Next Synopsis

Soft Matter

Imaging colloids

Read More »

Related Articles

Synopsis: Throwing Nuclei in the Ring
Nuclear Physics

Synopsis: Throwing Nuclei in the Ring

By trapping nuclei in a particle storage ring, researchers characterize previously inaccessible nuclear reactions that take place in stellar explosions. Read More »

Viewpoint: Cavity with Iron Nuclei Slows Down X Rays

Viewpoint: Cavity with Iron Nuclei Slows Down X Rays

Slow light effects have been measured for x rays using a cavity filled with iron nuclei, where the speed of light was reduced by a factor of 10,000. Read More »

Viewpoint: Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron
Particles and Fields

Viewpoint: Cyclotron Radiation from One Electron

An electron’s energy can be determined with high accuracy by detecting the radiation it emits when moving in a magnetic field. Read More »

More Articles