Synopsis: Ranking scientists

An analysis of the citation network leads to an alternative way to quantitatively assess the impact of a scientist’s work.
Synopsis figure
Illustration: F. Radicchi et al., Phys. Rev. E (2009)

Most metrics of a scientist’s impact in a field, like the h-index, rely primarily on the number of times his or her papers have been cited, and can miss the more subtle ways that knowledge and credit for this research spread among scientists. Now, in a paper appearing in Physical Review E, Filippo Radicchi and Santo Fortunato at the Institute for Scientific Interchange in Torino, Italy, and Benjamin Markines and Alessandro Vespignani at Indiana University in the US are instead proposing a way to rank scientists that reflects the diffusion of scientific credit in time. Their method, based on an algorithm similar to Google’s PageRank, takes into account several nontrivial effects such as the fact that being cited by an important author has more influence than being cited by one who is less well known.

By analyzing a set of about 400,000 papers published between 1893 and 2006 in the Physical Review, Radicchi et al. establish a ranking according to their “Science Author Rank Algorithm.” They show that the probability of winning a physics prize is consistently higher for authors who have top positions, according to their algorithm, than for other popular metrics. Moreover, the top positions in their ranking are not necessarily held by those scientists who have garnered the greatest number of citations.

Assessing scientists and their merit has, nowadays, become a crucial task for many policy makers. Radicchi et al.’s paper reminds us that a scientist’s merit and scientific impact cannot always be encoded in a single number, but results from a complex process of interactions between the members of the scientific community. In this respect, this paper is a beautiful first step towards a credible alternative quantitative ranking of scientists’ work. – Marc Barthelemy


More Announcements »

Subject Areas

Interdisciplinary Physics

Previous Synopsis

Next Synopsis

Plasma Physics

A skein of plasma

Read More »

Related Articles

Viewpoint: How Stereotypes Impact Women in Physics
Interdisciplinary Physics

Viewpoint: How Stereotypes Impact Women in Physics

Two studies by social scientists have discovered evidence of both subtle and blatant stereotyping of women in physics laboratories. Read More »

Focus: How to Compare Books or Genomes
Complex Systems

Focus: How to Compare Books or Genomes

A mathematical technique for comparing large symbol sets suggests that less frequently used words are mainly responsible for the evolution of the English language over the past two centuries. Read More »

Synopsis: Playing Games with Schrödinger
Interdisciplinary Physics

Synopsis: Playing Games with Schrödinger

Models that treat economic and biological behavior in terms of game-play resemble quantum mechanics. Read More »

More Articles