Synopsis: Rescuing Heisenberg

A new analysis of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle gives a more consistent way of addressing the disturbing effect of measurements.

The popular conception of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is that measurement is unavoidably invasive. We disturb an object when we observe it, thus introducing error into subsequent measurements. However, recent experiments (see 6 September 2012 Synopsis) claim to have measurement errors below the Heisenberg limit. To address this apparent contradiction, a paper in Physical Review Letters reports a new formulation of the uncertainty principle in which measurement disturbance depends on the performance of the measuring device, which is quantified as the maximum possible change in the state of the object.

Physicists often characterize the uncertainty principle in terms of how a particle’s state is prepared. For instance, placing a particle in a small box lets us know its position fairly precisely, but it leaves the momentum with a wide range of possible values. Another way of looking at this is through measurement effects. Heisenberg himself gave the example of a microscope that scatters photons from a particle to measure its position. The shorter the photon wavelength, the more precise the position measurement can be, but also the greater the disturbance to the particle’s momentum. However, recent work with so-called “weak” measurements seems to indicate that disturbances can be less than Heisenberg would predict.

Paul Busch of the University of York in the UK and his colleagues believe there is no contradiction here, but only a misunderstanding over how to characterize the effects of measurement. Previously, measurement-induced errors have been calculated on a state-by-state basis, by comparing the state of a system “before” and “after” a measurement. But Busch et al. show that defining measurement error in a state-independent way, through a kind of calibration process of the measuring device, leads to limits in line with the uncertainty principle. – Michael Schirber


Announcements

More Announcements »

Subject Areas

Quantum Physics

Previous Synopsis

Quantum Physics

Building a Better Quantum State

Read More »

Next Synopsis

Related Articles

Focus: Two Atoms Can Jointly Absorb One Photon
Quantum Physics

Focus: Two Atoms Can Jointly Absorb One Photon

Theorists show that two atoms in an optical cavity can absorb the same photon. Read More »

Viewpoint: Squeezed Light Reengineers Resonance Fluorescence
Atomic and Molecular Physics

Viewpoint: Squeezed Light Reengineers Resonance Fluorescence

By bathing a superconducting qubit in squeezed light, researchers have been able to confirm a decades-old prediction for the resulting phase-dependent spectrum of resonance fluorescence. Read More »

Viewpoint: Many-Body Localization Needs a Bath
Quantum Physics

Viewpoint: Many-Body Localization Needs a Bath

Theoretical work proves that interacting quantum systems can enter a many-body localized phase in which they cannot reach thermal equilibrium without an external bath. Read More »

More Articles