Explaining Mercury’s Superconductivity, 111 Years Later

Physics 15, s155
Theorists have finally explained the superconductivity of mercury, the first superconductor ever discovered—gaining insights that could be relevant to the search for room-temperature superconductors.
Gianni Profeta and Cesare Tresca/University of L’Aquila

In 1911, physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes used liquid helium—whose production method he invented—to cool mercury to a few kelvins, discovering that its electrical resistance dropped to nil. Although mercury was later found to be a “conventional” superconductor, no microscopic theory so far managed to fully explain the metal’s behavior and to predict its critical temperature TC. Now, 111 years after Kamerlingh Onnes’ discovery, theorists have done just that. Their first-principles calculations accurately predict mercury’s TC but also pinpoint theoretical caveats that could inform searches for room-temperature superconductors [1].

Mercury is an exception among conventional superconductors, most of which can be successfully described with state-of-the-art density-functional-theory methods. To tackle mercury’s unique challenges, Gianni Profeta of the University of L’Aquila, Italy, and colleagues scrutinized all physical properties relevant for conventional superconductivity, which is mediated by the coupling of electrons to phonons. In particular, the researchers accounted for previously neglected relativistic effects that alter phonon frequencies, they improved the description of electron-correlation effects that modify electronic bands, and they showed that mercury’s d-electrons provide an anomalous screening effect that promotes superconductivity by reducing Coulomb repulsion between superconducting electrons. With these improvements, their calculations delivered a TC prediction for mercury only 2.5% lower than the experimental value.

The new understanding of the oldest superconductor will find a place in textbooks but may also offer valuable lessons for superconductivity research, says Profeta. A promising material-by-design approach involves “high-throughput” computations that screen millions of theoretical material combinations to suggest those that could be conventional superconductors close to ambient conditions. “If we don’t include subtle effects similar to those relevant for mercury, these computations may overlook many interesting materials or err in their critical temperature predictions by hundreds of kelvins,” he says.

–Matteo Rini

Matteo Rini is the Editor of Physics Magazine.


  1. C. Tresca et al., “Why mercury is a superconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 106, L180501 (2022).

Subject Areas

SuperconductivityCondensed Matter Physics

Related Articles

In a Twist, Composite Fermions Form and Flow without a Magnetic Field
Materials Science

In a Twist, Composite Fermions Form and Flow without a Magnetic Field

Certain twisted semiconductor bilayers are predicted to host a Fermi liquid of composite fermions—remarkably, without an applied magnetic field. Read More »

A Fine Probe of Layer Stacking
Condensed Matter Physics

A Fine Probe of Layer Stacking

The combination of nuclear magnetic resonance with first-principles calculations uncovers the stacking patterns of layers of a quantum material—information that could enable a deeper understanding of the material’s behavior. Read More »

Quasiparticles Repel, Then Attract
Quantum Physics

Quasiparticles Repel, Then Attract

Resonant excitation of a thin-film semiconductor leads to impurities that attract rather than repel each other, providing a possible tool for manipulating superconductivity. Read More »

More Articles