FOCUS

Nobel Prize: Quantum Tunneling on a Large Scale

Physics 18, 170
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics recognizes the discovery of macroscopic quantum tunneling in electrical circuits.
J. Kelly/University of California, Santa Barbara
Mimicking atoms. Pioneering experiments in the mid-1980s showed tunneling and other quantum behaviors in superconducting circuits. This work, which has just been honored with the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics, set the stage for developments in superconducting quantum bits (qubits). The photo shows a nine-qubit array built in 2015 by John Martinis—one of the Nobel laureates—and his colleagues.

9 October 2025: We have replaced our initial short announcement with this full-length Focus story.

Quantum particles can penetrate through barriers, a behavior called tunneling. But large objects consisting of billions of particles can also display tunneling behavior [13], as demonstrated by the recipients of this year’s Nobel Prize in Physics—John Clarke from the University of California (UC), Berkeley; Michel Devoret from Yale University and UC Santa Barbara; and John Martinis from UC Santa Barbara. Using a superconducting circuit, they showed that the superconducting electrons, acting as a collective unit, can tunnel across an energy barrier between two quantum states. The work thrust open the field of superconducting circuits, offering a basis for subsequent advances in quantum computing.

This year is the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology, so it is perhaps fitting that the Nobel committee selected quantum tunneling for this year’s physics prize. Tunneling is quintessentially quantum, since “going through walls” flies in the face of our classical intuition. And yet, this is not the first Nobel for tunneling. Half of the 1973 physics prize went to Japanese physicist Leo Esaki and Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giaever for experiments on tunnelling in semiconductors and superconductors. The other half went to Welsh physicist Brian Josephson for predictions of tunneling across barriers—now called Josephson junctions—in superconducting circuits.

That earlier work on quantum tunneling considered how a single quantum particle behaves at a barrier. The basic model assumes that the particle’s quantum wave function penetrates into the barrier but with an exponentially suppressed amplitude. As a result, the particle has some small probability of appearing on the opposite side of the barrier. That probability can explain, for example, the rate at which alpha particles tunnel out of radioactive nuclei.

J. Jarnestad/Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Quantum catch. Most objects bounce off a wall or barrier, but quantum objects can occasionally pass through to the other side. This phenomenon is called tunneling.

Quantum theory does not restrict tunneling to the smallest particles. A large object is made of many particles whose collective wave function can in principle penetrate a barrier. The challenge, however, is that environmental disturbances can easily disrupt the collective wave function and destroy the possibility of tunneling. A suggestion was made at the beginning of the 1980s that superconducting circuits might be “environmentally quiet” enough to allow for macroscopic tunneling [4]. Several experiments looked for the effect, but the evidence was ambiguous because of noise in the circuits.

Clarke, Devoret, and Martinis (all working at UC Berkeley at the time) designed an experiment that overcame the noise problem. Their system was a centimeter-wide superconducting circuit containing a Josephson junction. The superconducting electrons in the circuit form a collective system, essentially a macroscopic object, described by a single quantum phase. Previously developed models showed that this multielectron object can exist in one of two states, corresponding to zero voltage and nonzero voltage across the junction. These two states are separated from each other by an energy barrier, which one can imagine as a steep hill between two valleys.

In a departure from previous experiments, the team used microwaves—injected through wires as an alternating current—as the means to control and measure the parameters of the circuit. “The microwaves provided an extra dimension that was absolutely critical to pinning down what was going on and revealing the quantum-mechanical behavior,” Martinis says.

The researchers initialized the circuit in the zero-voltage state, effectively trapping the multielectron object on one side of the energy barrier. But the object could still “escape” (observable as a sudden switch in the voltage) thanks to thermal fluctuations that gave it enough energy to climb over the barrier. They found that, as expected, the escape rate decreased as they cooled the system. However, below 50 mK the escape rate stopped dropping with temperature and instead remained constant—evidence that the object was tunneling through the barrier without any need of thermal fluctuations.

Using their microwave input, the researchers could also excite the superconducting electrons in their zero-voltage “valley” and observe the effect on the tunneling. They found that—just as an atom has quantized energy levels—the multielectron object has a discrete ladder of higher energy states. “We showed that you could build and customize a kind of artificial atom,” Martinis says.

This ability to engineer atom-like behavior in a macroscopic device attracted a lot of interest in the years that followed. “It was kind of a surprise to have a human-made object following the same kind of equation, the Schrödinger wave equation, that an atom would,” says Yasunobu Nakamura from the University of Tokyo. He and others later refined the superconducting circuit technology, showing that the multielectron system could effectively inhabit two states at once—a quantum superposition [5]. Subsequent work led to devices that could store and process quantum information, and now superconducting circuit technology is one of the most popular platforms for quantum bits (see Viewpoint: A Superconducting Qubit that Protects Itself). “The pioneering work of the Berkeley team really opened up our field,” Nakamura says.

–Michael Schirber

Michael Schirber is a Corresponding Editor for Physics Magazine based in Lyon, France.

References

  1. M. H. Devoret et al., “Resonant activation from the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson Junction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1260 (1984).
  2. J. M. Martinis et al., “Energy-level quantization in the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson Junction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985).
  3. M. H. Devoret et al., “Measurements of macroscopic quantum tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson Junction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1908 (1985).
  4. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211 (1981).
  5. Y. Nakamura et al., “Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box,” Nature 398, 786 (1999).

More Information


Subject Areas

Quantum PhysicsSuperconductivity

Related Articles

The Costs of Quantum Timekeeping
Statistical Physics

The Costs of Quantum Timekeeping

Experiments reveal the surprisingly large amount of entropy—and thus heat—generated by a clock that could be part of a quantum processor. Read More »

Measuring the Entropy of a Double Quantum Dot
Nanophysics

Measuring the Entropy of a Double Quantum Dot

Researchers have taken a step toward using entropy to probe the quantum physics of nanoscopic many-electron systems. Read More »

Quantum Scars Unmasked
Quantum Information

Quantum Scars Unmasked

A new approach finds useful patterns called quantum scars in the complex dynamics of quantum many-body systems. Read More »

More Articles