Synopsis

# Quantum-ness Put on the Scale

Physics 6, s57
A new standard for measuring the relative size of a quantum object could help in comparing different experiments at the quantum-classical boundary.

How much weirder would it be to see Schrödinger’s living/dead cat than to observe a tiny cluster of atoms interfering with itself in a double-slit experiment? That judgment might be in the eye of the observer, but physicists are interested in quantifying the effective size of macroscopic quantum objects in order to explore the border between quantum and classical physics. A new definition for this quantum size, or so-called macroscopicity, is based on how much leeway a given experiment leaves for quantum mechanics to be modified at a fundamental level. In a paper in Physical Review Letters, Stefan Nimmrichter of the University of Vienna, Austria, and Klaus Hornberger of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, apply this formalism to a wide range of experiments, both completed and hypothetical.

Physics students learn early on how electrons and other particles behave both as particles and waves. But experimentalists continue to challenge our intuition with multiparticle objects existing in quantum superpositions of two or more states. Examples include tiny drums, superconducting circuits, and multiatom clusters. Although all of these experiments are impressive, it is not clear how to compare the collective size of their quantum behavior. Previous attempts to define the macroscopicity have tended to be model dependent; for example, they count the particles in a buckyball molecule as being either $60$ carbon atoms or $1080$ nucleons and electrons.

The authors have devised a universal formulation for the macroscopicity. They first imagined ways that the quantum equations could be modified towards a more classical representation. They then assigned a macroscopicity according to how many of these hypothetical modifications are ruled out by a particular experiment. The bigger a multiparticle quantum superposition is, the more modifications it rules out and the higher its macroscopicity. On the team’s logarithmic scale, state-of-the-art interferometer experiments with atoms and molecules earn macroscopicity grades of about $12$. A proposed double-slit experiment with silica nanospheres would receive $20$, whereas a simplified version of Schrödinger’s famous thought experiment on the quantum superposition of a cat earns the author’s highest score of $57$. – Michael Schirber

Quantum Physics

## Related Articles

Quantum Physics

### Getting a Handle on Timing

Ideas from superresolution imaging inspire a way to measure time intervals with unprecedented precision—an ability that could enhance our understanding of ultrafast processes. Read More »

Quantum Physics

### Ultrabright Photons for Single-Chip Quantum Devices

A microcavity-based source of photon pairs achieves one hundred times the efficiency of state-of-the-art devices. Read More »

Computational Physics

### Gaining a Quantum Advantage Sooner than Expected

For an important quantum many-body problem, a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm could outperform purely classical approaches using surprisingly few quantum resources.   Read More »