Viewpoint: Graphene Gets a Good Gap

  • Alessandra Lanzara, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720-7300, USA
Physics 8, 91
Researchers have engineered a large energy band gap in a graphene layer grown on a silicon carbide substrate.
Figure 1: In freestanding graphene, the valence and conduction energy bands, called 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands, meet at momentum points K and K (left). Conrad and colleagues [2] have shown that, although the first carbon layer of samples grown epitaxially on a silicon carbide substrate at a temperature of about 1340C is electronically inert and so does not display a band structure (middle), for growth temperatures 20C higher, the layer becomes active and exhibits 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands separated by a gap of 0.5 electron volts around the K and K points.In freestanding graphene, the valence and conduction energy bands, called 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands, meet at momentum points K and K (left). Conrad and colleagues [2] have shown that, although the first carbon layer of samples grown epitaxially on a silicon ca... Show more

The invention of silicon semiconductor integrated circuits more than fifty years ago has paved the way for modern electronics and computing. But with more than 10 times better electronic conduction properties than silicon, graphene—a carbon sheet just one atom thick—is considered silicon’s ideal replacement. This “wonder material” promises to deliver electronic devices much smaller, faster, more flexible, and more efficient than their silicon analogs [1]. However, one of the roadblocks to using graphene for making such devices is the lack of a sizeable energy gap, or band gap, in its electronic energy structure. Ed Conrad from the Georgia Institute of Technology and colleagues [2] now show that they have opened a large band gap in a graphene sheet by growing it on the silicon face of a silicon carbide substrate.

The band gap in a semiconductor is the minimum energy required to excite an electron that is stuck in a bound state into a state in which it can participate in conduction. It largely determines the transport and optical properties of the semiconductor. In terms of the material’s electronic energy band structure, the band gap is the energy difference between the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band. The Fermi level, defined as the top of available electron energy levels, is located halfway between these two bands.

Graphene has a peculiar band structure. Its valence and conduction bands, known technically as 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands, show a linear (conical) relationship between electron energy and momentum and meet at certain points ( K and K in Fig. 1) [1]. This unusual dispersion relationship makes graphene a zero-gap material, which conducts electrons like a metal. But without a gap, there is no way of controlling and stopping the material’s electrons—features that are needed to make electronic circuitry.

Nonetheless, because of graphene’s incredible properties and potential, researchers have been actively searching for ways to create a semiconductor version of the material. Using the method of quantum confinement, band gaps have been engineered in graphene quantum dots [3] and graphene ribbons [4]. The generated band gaps are generally too small, on the order of a few milli-electron-volts. But for extremely narrow ribbons, the gap can reach values as large as 100meV. It is, however, difficult to scale up this narrow form of graphene for mass production.

Among the various methods to make graphene, the technique of epitaxial growth is considered to be a promising route because of its scalability potential. The method involves using high heat to decompose a silicon carbide (SiC) substrate such that it forms one or more carbon layers [5]. So far, attention has mainly been on optimizing the growth of the first electronically active carbon layer, which displays the 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands. This graphene layer grows on top of an electronically inert carbon layer, known as the “buffer” layer, which does not exhibit the 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands [5, 6] despite having a crystal-lattice structure similar to that of graphene. It is in these epitaxial samples that researchers have managed to open the largest graphene band gap— 0.26eV in size [6]. The band gap in these samples lies well below the Fermi energy. Its opening has been attributed to the breaking of the symmetry of the two carbon sublattices that comprise the graphene layer, which is caused by the interaction between the graphene layer and the substrate [6].

Conrad and colleagues report a band gap in epitaxially grown graphene samples that is about a factor of 2 larger than this previous record value of 0.26eV. What is more, they succeeded in generating a band gap centered around the Fermi level, a fundamental requisite for turning graphene into a practical semiconductor. But a key difference from earlier work is that the authors focused their investigation not on the active layer of the samples but on the buffer layer, exploring a new temperature regime for the growth of the layer. The researchers analyzed their graphene samples using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). This is a “photon-in, electron-out technique” that measures the kinetic energy of electrons removed from the samples upon photon irradiation. Therefore, it provides information about the samples’ electronic energy band structure. For samples grown at a temperature of about 1360C, the ARPES data revealed 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands separated by a gap of at least 0.5eV. However, for a growth temperature about 20C lower, the ARPES data did not show any gapped 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands. The results indicate that the growth temperature plays a crucial part in defining the electronic character of the buffer layer.

These intriguing observations are in partial agreement with previous studies that investigated the effect of intercalating hydrogen or germanium atoms between the buffer layer and the silicon carbide substrate [7, 8]. These studies showed that the inclusion of the hydrogen or germanium atoms resulted in the appearance of 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands in the buffer layer, but in contrast to Conrad and colleagues’ findings, no band gap has been observed in these cases. Also noteworthy is the authors’ finding of anisotropic 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands in momentum space. They show that the effective mass and velocity of electrons near the top of the valence band can vary by as much as 50% depending on the electrons’ propagation direction. This anisotropy hasn’t been observed in any previously studied samples of graphene.

The researchers suggest that the opening of the gap and the anisotropy of the 𝜋 and 𝜋 bands in their samples is caused by a periodic bonding between the graphene layer and the silicon carbide substrate. Testing this hypothesis, as well as the apparent critical role of sample temperature in turning the first carbon layer into a graphene sheet, will no doubt require further experimental and theoretical work. In the meantime, however, Conrad and co-workers’ results provide another beautiful piece of the puzzle of understanding and manipulating this amazing two-dimensional material and bring us a bit closer to the dream of using graphene to make electronic devices.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters

References

  1. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, “The Rise of Graphene,” Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007).
  2. M. S. Nevius, M. Conrad, F. Wang, A. Celis, M. N. Nair, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, A. Tejeda, and E. H. Conrad, “Semiconducting Graphene from Highly Ordered Substrate Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 136802 (2015).
  3. B. Trauzettel, D. V. Bulaev, D. Loss, and G. Burkard, “Spin Qubits in Graphene Quantum Dots,” Nature Phys. 3, 192 (2007).
  4. M. Y. Han, B. Özyilmaz, Y. Zhang, and P. Kim, “Energy Band-Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206805 (2007).
  5. C. Berger et al., “Ultrathin Epitaxial Graphite: 2D Electron Gas Properties and a Route Toward Graphene-Based Nanoelectronics,” J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 19912 (2004).
  6. S. Y. Zhou, G.-H. Gweon, A. V. Fedorov, P. N. First, W. A. de Heer, D.-H. Lee, F. Guinea, A. H. Castro Neto, and A. Lanzara, “Substrate-Induced Bandgap Opening in Epitaxial Graphene,” Nature Mater. 6, 770 (2007).
  7. C. Riedl, C. Coletti, T. Iwasaki, A. A. Zakharov, and U. Starke, “Quasi-Free-Standing Epitaxial Graphene on SiC Obtained by Hydrogen Intercalation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 246804 (2009).
  8. S. Forti, K. V. Emtsev, C. Coletti, A. A. Zakharov, C. Riedl, and U. Starke, “Large-Area Homogeneous Quasifree Standing Epitaxial Graphene on SiC(0001): Electronic and Structural Characterization,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 125449 (2011).

About the Author

Image of Alessandra Lanzara

Alessandra Lanzara is a Professor in the Physics Department at the University of California, Berkeley, and has been a Faculty Scientist at the Materials Sciences Division of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory since 2002. She earned a Ph.D. from the University of Rome La Sapienza in 1999 and was a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University from 1999 to 2002. Her research focuses on emergent quantum matter, including unconventional superconductors, topological condensates, and two-dimensional materials. She is a fellow of the American Physical Society and the Italian Physical Society, and has received numerous awards and prizes. http://research.physics.berkeley.edu/lanzara/


Read PDF

Subject Areas

GrapheneElectronics

Related Articles

Focus: A Graphene Waveguide For Electrons
Condensed Matter Physics

Focus: A Graphene Waveguide For Electrons

A new waveguide that uses a nanotube to guide electrons could lead to novel types of circuitry in quantum computers. Read More »

Viewpoint: Graphene Is Thin, but Not Infinitely So
Condensed Matter Physics

Viewpoint: Graphene Is Thin, but Not Infinitely So

Atomically thin graphene is considered a prototypical 2D material, but high-pressure experiments now reveal the 3D nature of its mechanical properties. Read More »

Synopsis: Correcting Hardware Bias in Molecular Spectrometers
Atomic and Molecular Physics

Synopsis: Correcting Hardware Bias in Molecular Spectrometers

More accurate measurements of CO2 in the atmosphere can be obtained by accounting for discrepancies in spectroscopy hardware. Read More »

More Articles