Landmarks: NMR–Grandmother of MRI

Phys. Rev. Focus 18, 18
Two experiments in 1946, showing how electromagnetic waves could flip atomic nuclei, eventually led to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
M. Kirschen/Stanford Univ.
Brain waves. A technique called functional MRI can show active areas of the brain as subjects perform tasks, as in this image showing areas active for visual memory (green), aural memory (red), and both types of memory (yellow). MRI technology is based on nuclear magnetic resonance in liquids and solids, first reported in 1946.

APS has put the entire Physical Review archive online, back to 1893. Focus Landmarks feature important papers from the archive.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), known for its stunningly clear pictures of the body’s interior, has its roots in experiments that measured elementary properties of atomic nuclei. In 1946, researchers reported in the Physical Review the first detections of so-called nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in solids and liquids, work that led to a Nobel prize. In the following years, NMR quickly established its mettle as an investigative tool in physics and chemistry as well as biology and medicine.

Many atomic nuclei act like little bar magnets similar to the one in a compass. A compass needle aligns with the Earth’s magnetic field, but quantum mechanics allows magnetic nuclei two possible alignments in a magnetic field, equivalent to a compass pointing either north (lower energy) or south (higher energy).

During the 1930s, I.I. Rabi at Columbia University in New York showed that electromagnetic waves with the right frequency could flip magnetically aligned nuclei from one state to the other. Photons at this special NMR frequency had just the right energy to boost nuclei from the lower energy state to the higher energy state. Rabi and his collaborators experimented on beams of nuclei passing through magnetic fields, but in 1946, two teams of researchers demonstrated ways to detect the same phenomenon in liquids and solids.

At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Edward Purcell, Henry Torrey, and Robert Pound filled an electromagnetic cavity with almost a liter of solid paraffin. A magnetic field of several thousand gauss forced the paraffin’s hydrogen nuclei–protons–into either of the two allowed magnetic alignments. The team then sent waves at a fixed radio frequency (RF) into the cavity and gradually increased the magnetic field strength. As the field increased, the energy difference between the two states increased, eventually reaching the energy of the RF photons. At that point, electrical measurement showed a sharp increase in the cavity’s absorption of radiation as nuclei flipped from the lower to the higher energy state. Once in the higher state, a nucleus drops down to the lower state, re-radiating an RF photon. This “relaxation” process, which the team reasoned was essential to the detection of resonance, occurred in a matter of seconds.

Meanwhile, Felix Bloch, William Hansen, and Martin Packard of Stanford University in California set a vessel containing about two cubic centimeters of water in an adjustable magnetic field. Around this they wrapped a coil that delivered RF radiation at a frequency of a few megahertz. Like the MIT group, the Stanford team varied the magnetic field strength to reach resonance. Rather than measuring absorption, however, Bloch and his colleagues detected re-emission of resonant radiation using a second coil placed perpendicular to the first, so that it would not pick up the input waves. Following the team’s brief preliminary announcement in January of 1946, two papers set out the theory and experiment in greater depth in October [1].

Physicists quickly realized that nuclear magnetic resonance methods had many applications. Relaxation of aligned nuclei, for example, provides a sensitive technique to measure the interaction of nuclei with their own electrons and with other nearby atoms. Imaging came decades later: When a patient is placed in a magnetic field whose strength varies with position, the resonant frequency varies as well, so that RF emissions from relaxing nuclei reveal the positions of atoms. Stronger emission at a certain frequency implies denser tissue at the corresponding location.

Although Rabi’s work was crucial, the MIT and Stanford experiments were “a very big leap,” says Daniel Raftery of Purdue University in Lafayette, Indiana. “The experimental technique was very difficult.” Following Rabi’s 1944 physics Nobel Prize for discovering NMR, Purcell and Bloch shared the 1952 physics Nobel.

–David Lindley

David Lindley is a freelance science writer in Alexandria, Virginia.


  1. F. Bloch, “Nuclear Induction,” Phys. Rev. 70, 460 (1946); F. Bloch, W.W. Hansen, and M. Packard, “The Nuclear Induction Experiment,” Phys. Rev. 70, 474 (1946)

More Information

Subject Areas

MagnetismNuclear Physics

Related Articles

Proton Effective Charge Depends on Neutron Population
Nuclear Physics

Proton Effective Charge Depends on Neutron Population

Experiments comparing neutron-rich cadmium with previous data on a neutron-poor version prove that a key parameter in nuclear calculations depends on the neutron-to-proton ratio. Read More »

Classifying the Surface Magnetization of Antiferromagnets
Condensed Matter Physics

Classifying the Surface Magnetization of Antiferromagnets

Group theory and first-principles calculations combine to predict which antiferromagnets have potentially useful net surface magnetization. Read More »

Thin Films of Topological Magnets for Thermoelectric Applications

Thin Films of Topological Magnets for Thermoelectric Applications

A thin film of a topological magnet displays a large thermoelectric effect that doesn’t require an applied magnetic field—a behavior that could lead to new energy-harvesting devices. Read More »

More Articles