Synopsis: Testing Quantum Physics with Neutrinos

An experiment similar to the Bell inequality test confirms that neutrino oscillation is a quantum physics effect that is incompatible with alternative classical models.
Synopsis figure
MINOS

If you measure a system (such as a cat) and find it in one state (alive), you might assume it was in that state before your measurement. But quantum physics defies this classical (or realist) view of the world. Certain experiments have shown that quantum systems exhibit time correlations that violate the so-called Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI), which bounds classical theories. A new LGI test using neutrino oscillation data provides the longest distance verification of quantum physics to date.

The LGI test is the time analogue of the well-known Bell inequality test. Rather than measure two systems at different locations (as in Bell), an LGI experiment traditionally measures the same system at different times. The quantum prediction is that correlations between different measurements can exceed a bound set by classical models. Previous LGI tests have used a variety of systems, including superconducting qubits and photons.

One concern with LGI tests is that a stubborn “realist” could claim the measurements disturb the system and skew the results. In their neutrino-based test, Joseph Formaggio and his colleagues from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, minimized disturbance by comparing measurements on separate groups of neutrinos. The team analyzed data from the MINOS neutrino experiment, which measures a beam of muon neutrinos with two detectors—one near the source at Fermilab and the other 735 km away in the Soudan Mine, Minnesota. The far detector shows a deficit of muon neutrinos, due to quantum oscillations. Formaggio and co-workers selected 715 sets of data points from the MINOS sample and found that 577 of these sets violated the classical limit. The results rule out a class of realist models in which the evolving system does not depend on any “memory” of its initial state.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters.

–Michael Schirber

Michael Schirber is a Corresponding Editor for Physics based in Lyon, France.


Features

More Features »

Announcements

More Announcements »

Subject Areas

Quantum PhysicsParticles and Fields

Previous Synopsis

Fluid Dynamics

Tiny Droplets Do the Twist

Read More »

Next Synopsis

Related Articles

Viewpoint: Zeroing in on the Muon’s Magnetism
Particles and Fields

Viewpoint: Zeroing in on the Muon’s Magnetism

A theoretical reevaluation of the muon’s magnetic moment gives the highest precision prediction so far, while doubling down on a discrepancy with experiments. Read More »

Viewpoint: Watching a Quantum Magnet Grow in Ultracold Atoms
Magnetism

Viewpoint: Watching a Quantum Magnet Grow in Ultracold Atoms

Two experiments watch an antiferromagnetic phase of matter emerge in ultracold Rydberg atoms, opening up a new platform for quantum simulation. Read More »

Synopsis: How to Untangle Quark and Gluon Jets
Particles and Fields

Synopsis: How to Untangle Quark and Gluon Jets

Inspired by a text-mining technique, scientists have developed a more direct way to distinguish quark jets from gluon jets in high-energy particle collisions. Read More »

More Articles