Synopsis

New Physics Possibilities from Kaon Decay

Physics 13, s25
Previously unpredicted particles or a new type of particle interaction could explain the unexpected rare kaon decay events reported by the KOTO experiment in Japan.
K. Tobioka/Florida State University

At the International Conference on Kaon Physics last year, a group of researchers searching for rare forms of kaon decays announced preliminary results that—if confirmed to be signal and not background—defy the standard model. Now, Kohsaku Tobioka of Florida State University, Tallahassee, and colleagues propose three explanations for the unexpected detections that involve new physics beyond the standard model, including the possibility of new particles.

The announcement from the KOTO experiment at J-PARC in Japan related to the detection of four potential instances of a rare decay of the long-lived neutral kaon KL into a pion and two neutrinos—the standard model predicts only 0.1 such events for the experimental run’s sample size. Meanwhile, CERN’s NA62 experiment announced finding no excess events for the equivalent decay of the positively charged kaon K+compared to predictions. Together, these results defy a well-established relationship between the rates of the two decays, which dictates that the KL decay should occur less frequently than its positively charged counterpart.

Tobioka and colleagues came up with three explanations for the results. One proposal includes an additional particle interaction that could make KL decay more often. The other two ideas involve new particles. The researchers suggest that KL might sometimes decay into a pion and an invisible particle X, with that decay masquerading as the one that produces a pion and two neutrinos. Or, they say, KOTO could have witnessed the decay of some unknown particle, and not a kaon.

A special data run at the KOTO experiment this year aims to confirm whether the candidate events were true detections. If they are true, Tobioka says that he and his colleagues will test their proposals to find out which one is correct.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters.

–Erika K. Carlson

Erika K. Carlson is a Corresponding Editor for Physics based in Brooklyn, New York.


Subject Areas

Particles and Fields

Related Articles

Cooling Hadron Beams with Electron Pulses
Particles and Fields

Cooling Hadron Beams with Electron Pulses

Pulsed electron beams can be used to cool beams of ions and protons circulating in a hadron storage ring—a promising development for future high-energy accelerators. Read More »

Finding New Forces with Old Techniques
Nuclear Physics

Finding New Forces with Old Techniques

Interactions predicted by beyond-standard-model theories could be detected using a variation on Mössbauer spectroscopy, according to a new proposal. Read More »

Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Wraps Up
Particles and Fields

Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Wraps Up

The GERDA hunt for neutrinoless double-beta decay comes to an end with no evidence that neutrinos are their own antiparticle. Read More »

More Articles