Synopsis

Ranking scientists

Physics 2, s108
An analysis of the citation network leads to an alternative way to quantitatively assess the impact of a scientist’s work.
Illustration: F. Radicchi et al., Phys. Rev. E (2009)

Most metrics of a scientist’s impact in a field, like the h-index, rely primarily on the number of times his or her papers have been cited, and can miss the more subtle ways that knowledge and credit for this research spread among scientists. Now, in a paper appearing in Physical Review E, Filippo Radicchi and Santo Fortunato at the Institute for Scientific Interchange in Torino, Italy, and Benjamin Markines and Alessandro Vespignani at Indiana University in the US are instead proposing a way to rank scientists that reflects the diffusion of scientific credit in time. Their method, based on an algorithm similar to Google’s PageRank, takes into account several nontrivial effects such as the fact that being cited by an important author has more influence than being cited by one who is less well known.

By analyzing a set of about 400,000 papers published between 1893 and 2006 in the Physical Review, Radicchi et al. establish a ranking according to their “Science Author Rank Algorithm.” They show that the probability of winning a physics prize is consistently higher for authors who have top positions, according to their algorithm, than for other popular metrics. Moreover, the top positions in their ranking are not necessarily held by those scientists who have garnered the greatest number of citations.

Assessing scientists and their merit has, nowadays, become a crucial task for many policy makers. Radicchi et al.’s paper reminds us that a scientist’s merit and scientific impact cannot always be encoded in a single number, but results from a complex process of interactions between the members of the scientific community. In this respect, this paper is a beautiful first step towards a credible alternative quantitative ranking of scientists’ work. – Marc Barthelemy


Subject Areas

Interdisciplinary Physics

Related Articles

The Lure of Cement
Interdisciplinary Physics

The Lure of Cement

Physicist Ankita Gangotra pours over innovative technologies and policy initiatives to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions of the US cement industry. Read More »

Fooling Around with Boxes
Interdisciplinary Physics

Fooling Around with Boxes

Researchers have uncovered the optimal design for a lidded carboard box to ensure that the lid drops as quickly and smoothly as possible—and it’s not what you might think. Read More »

Making Physics Inclusive to LGBTQ+ Folks
Interdisciplinary Physics

Making Physics Inclusive to LGBTQ+ Folks

Despite improvements in working conditions, harassment and discrimination continue to affect the retention of LGBTQ+ physicists; creating positive workplace climates could help. Read More »

More Articles