Synopsis

Ranking scientists

Physics 2, s108
An analysis of the citation network leads to an alternative way to quantitatively assess the impact of a scientist’s work.
Illustration: F. Radicchi et al., Phys. Rev. E (2009)

Most metrics of a scientist’s impact in a field, like the h-index, rely primarily on the number of times his or her papers have been cited, and can miss the more subtle ways that knowledge and credit for this research spread among scientists. Now, in a paper appearing in Physical Review E, Filippo Radicchi and Santo Fortunato at the Institute for Scientific Interchange in Torino, Italy, and Benjamin Markines and Alessandro Vespignani at Indiana University in the US are instead proposing a way to rank scientists that reflects the diffusion of scientific credit in time. Their method, based on an algorithm similar to Google’s PageRank, takes into account several nontrivial effects such as the fact that being cited by an important author has more influence than being cited by one who is less well known.

By analyzing a set of about 400,000 papers published between 1893 and 2006 in the Physical Review, Radicchi et al. establish a ranking according to their “Science Author Rank Algorithm.” They show that the probability of winning a physics prize is consistently higher for authors who have top positions, according to their algorithm, than for other popular metrics. Moreover, the top positions in their ranking are not necessarily held by those scientists who have garnered the greatest number of citations.

Assessing scientists and their merit has, nowadays, become a crucial task for many policy makers. Radicchi et al.’s paper reminds us that a scientist’s merit and scientific impact cannot always be encoded in a single number, but results from a complex process of interactions between the members of the scientific community. In this respect, this paper is a beautiful first step towards a credible alternative quantitative ranking of scientists’ work. – Marc Barthelemy


Subject Areas

Interdisciplinary Physics

Related Articles

A New Science for Describing Unhealthy Online Environments
Interdisciplinary Physics

A New Science for Describing Unhealthy Online Environments

A theory derived from nonlinear fluid dynamics is able to reproduce the formation dynamics of online hate communities—offering insights that could inform public policies. Read More »

Flipping the Script to Support Wider Engagement with Physics
Interdisciplinary Physics

Flipping the Script to Support Wider Engagement with Physics

Discussing the profiles of physicists from minoritized groups with high school students keeps students from such groups engaged in physics beyond school. Read More »

“Off Switch” Makes Explosives Safer
Industrial Physics

“Off Switch” Makes Explosives Safer

An explosive material fabricated with a highly porous structure is inactive but is easily “switched on” when filled with water. Read More »

More Articles