Synopsis: Pinning Down Superheavy Masses

A new measurement technique directly determines the masses of two superheavy isotopes, providing confirmation that previous indirect measurements were correct.
Synopsis figure
J. Gates and J. Pore/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Researchers synthesize superheavy elements by smashing together nuclei. But identifying the mass of the resulting short-lived isotopes is tricky, often relying on indirect methods. Now, Jacklyn Gates from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, and her colleagues have directly measured the masses of two superheavy isotopes. These two firm data points strengthen researchers’ confidence in previous mass measurements of neighboring isotopes in the periodic table.

Normally, physicists determine the mass of a single nucleus by tracking its decay—sometimes through several steps—to some well-known daughter nucleus. Imagine, for example, that a nucleus decays by emitting four alpha particles (each containing two protons and two neutrons), arriving at the identifiable daughter nucleus nobelium-255 (atomic number Z=102). Working backwards, researchers can determine that the original nucleus was darmstadtium-271 (Z=110). The problem for superheavy elements with atomic numbers above Z=113 is that the daughter nuclei are largely unknown, so researchers have devised other, less certain, techniques for identifying the decay channels of the isotopes in this mass range.

In their direct method, Gates and colleagues irradiate an americium-243 (Z=95) target with a beam of calcium-48 (Z=20) ions, producing superheavy nuclei with a variety of masses. These nuclei pass through a series of devices that spatially separates them based on their mass-to-charge ratio. After this filtering, the nuclei embed in a silicon detector that records alpha emissions. Any detected alpha pinpoints the position—and therefore the mass—of an embedded nucleus. Using this method, the team detected isotopes of moscovium (Z=115) and nihonium (Z=113), determining their masses to be 288 and 284, respectively. By measuring decay times and energies, the researchers were able to show that their results are consistent with previous superheavy mass studies.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters.

–Michael Schirber

Michael Schirber is a Corresponding Editor for Physics based in Lyon, France.


More Features »


More Announcements »

Subject Areas

Nuclear Physics

Previous Synopsis

Next Synopsis

Related Articles

Synopsis: Revamping the Skyrmion Model
Nuclear Physics

Synopsis: Revamping the Skyrmion Model

Theorists extend a nearly six-decades-old model for the atomic nucleus and use it to predict shape effects that the traditional model misses. Read More »

Viewpoint: Dissecting the Mass of the Proton
Nuclear Physics

Viewpoint: Dissecting the Mass of the Proton

A calculation determines four distinct contributions to the proton mass, more than 90% of which arises entirely from the dynamics of quarks and gluons. Read More »

More Articles